The Finnish Understanding of Special Education and Inclusion: Treating all Students as ‘Special’

Mehmet Akif Ince 1 Türkiye
1 Istiklal University of Science and Technology
Link Copied!
Published 2026-11-01
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
DOI
Views / Downloads 35 10

This study describes the Finnish understanding of special education in relation to the understanding expressed in Türkiye’s official documents and evaluates it through the concept of inclusion. The data of this basic interpretive qualitative study consist of three official documents from each country, at the level of a law, an implementing regulation and a teacher qualification document, and semi-structured interviews with three special education teachers, a school assistant, a principal and a school psychologist in Finland, coded on five criteria: who needs special education, who decides, where it is provided, who provides it and how that person is trained, and how it relates to mainstream education. The Finnish documents and interviews show that in the Finnish understanding the pupil who needs special education is any pupil who struggles at any moment, that the special education teacher employed in Finnish schools works as the teacher of every struggling pupil, and that support is provided within ordinary teaching in ways that avoid stigma, with decisions at the general support tier made collaboratively. The Turkish documents, the only Turkish data, tie special education to the individual diagnosed by an assessment board, to a teacher trained in a separate undergraduate programme and to regulated settings. The two understandings differ not in their commitment to inclusion but in whether special education begins before or after diagnosis; Finland pursues inclusion not by abolishing special education but by opening it to all students.

Keywords:
inclusive education special education special education teacher Finland comparative education
The Finnish Understanding of Special Education and Inclusion: Treating all Students as ‘Special’. (2026). Journal of Inclusive Language Education, 1(1). https://journaloflpl.org/index.php/jile/article/view/8
Download data is not yet available.
  1. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203967157
  2. Asetus opetustoimen henkilöstön kelpoisuusvaatimuksista 986/1998, 8 ja 8 a § (865/2005) [Decree on the qualifications of teaching staff, Sections 8 and 8 a, as amended by 865/2005]. (2005). Finlex. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/lainsaadanto/saadoskokoelma/2005/865
  3. Basic Education Act 628/1998. (1998). Finlex.
  4. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/lainsaadanto/saadoskaannokset/1998/eng/628
  5. Björn, P. M., Aro, M., Koponen, T., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2018). Response-to-intervention in Finland and the United States: Mathematics learning support as an example. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 800. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00800
  6. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  7. Büyükalan Filiz, S., Çelik Şahin, A., Tufan, S., & Karaahmetoğlu, B. (2018). Özel eğitim öğretmenliği lisans programlarının birleştirilmesine ilişkin öğretim üyelerinin görüşleri [Faculty members' views on the merging of special education teaching undergraduate programmes]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(3), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018036496
  8. Chong, P. W. (2018). The Finnish "recipe" towards inclusion: Concocting educational equity, policy rigour, and proactive support structures. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(4), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258668
  9. Department of Education and Science. (1978). Special educational needs: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People (Cmnd. 7212). Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
  10. EASPD. (2020). Barometer of inclusive education in selected European countries: 2020 summary report. European Association of Service providers for Persons with Disabilities.
  11. EDUFI. (2016). National core curriculum for basic education 2014 (Publications 2016:5). Finnish National Board for Education.
  12. Egelund, N., & Dyssegaard, C. B. (2019). Forty years after Warnock: Special needs education and the inclusion process in Denmark. Conceptual and practical challenges. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00054
  13. Eurydice. (2025, May 17). Türkiye: Öğretmenlerin hizmet öncesi eğitimi [Türkiye: Initial education for teachers]. European Commission. https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/tr/national-education-systems/turkey/okul-oncesi-ve-okul-ogretmenlerinin-hizmet-oncesi-egitimi
  14. Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2014). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (12th ed., Pearson new international ed.). Pearson.
  15. Hausstätter, R. S., & Takala, M. (2011). Can special education make a difference? Exploring the differences of special educational systems between Finland and Norway in relation to the PISA results. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 13(4), 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2010.507372
  16. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  17. İnce, M. A. (2025). İlişkisel adalet bağlamında Fin eğitim sisteminde hakkaniyetli eşitlik ve öğrenci destekleri [Equity and student support in the Finnish education system from the perspective of relational justice] (Reference No. 10599469) [Doctoral thesis, Ankara University]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  18. Jahnukainen, M. (2015). Inclusion, integration, or what? A comparative study of the school principals' perceptions of inclusive and special education in Finland and in Alberta, Canada. Disability & Society, 30(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.982788
  19. Jahnukainen, M., Hienonen, N., Lintuvuori, M., & Lempinen, S. (2023). Inclusion in Finland: Myths and realities. In M. Thrupp, P. Seppänen, J. Kauko, & S. Kosunen (Eds.), Finland's famous education system: Unvarnished insights into Finnish schooling (pp. 401–415). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8241-5_25
  20. Kotilainen, N., Sirkko, R., & Takala, M. (2025). Collaboration between subject teachers and special education teachers in Finnish lower secondary schools. Education Inquiry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2025.2518776
  21. Laki perusopetuslain muuttamisesta 1090/2024 [Act amending the Basic Education Act]. (2024). Finlex. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/lainsaadanto/saadoskokoelma/2024/1090
  22. Lindsay, G., Wedell, K., & Dockrell, J. (2020). Warnock 40 years on: The development of special educational needs since the Warnock Report and implications for the future. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 164. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00164
  23. Liu, L. (2016). Using generic inductive approach in qualitative educational research: A case study analysis. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n2p129
  24. MEB. (2018). Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği [Special Education Services Regulation]. Resmî Gazete (No. 30471, 7 July 2018).
  25. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=24736&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5
  26. MEB. (2025). Millî eğitim istatistikleri: Örgün eğitim 2024/’25 [National education statistics: Formal education 2024/’25]. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı, Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/istatistik_k/2425.pdf
  27. MEB. (2026). İlkokullarda yetiştirme programı (İYEP) [Primary school remedial programme]. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. https://iyep.meb.gov.tr/uploads/programlar/iyep-20261007054237.pdf
  28. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  29. Niemi, A.-M., & Mietola, R. (2023). Exclusively included? Finland's inclusion success story and hidden dual system of mainstream and special needs education. In M. Thrupp, P. Seppänen, J. Kauko, & S. Kosunen (Eds.), Finland's famous education system: Unvarnished insights into Finnish schooling (pp. 417–434). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8241-5_26
  30. OECD. (2000). Special needs education: Statistics and indicators. OECD Publishing.
  31. OECD. (2023). Equity and inclusion in education: Finding strength through diversity. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e9072e21-en
  32. Özel Eğitim Hakkında Kanun Hükmünde Kararname [Decree Law No. 573 on Special Education]. (1997). Resmî Gazete (No. 23011 bis, 6 June 1997). https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/4.5.573.pdf
  33. Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Jerrim, J. P., Guo, J., & Dicke, T. (2018). Inequity and excellence in academic performance: Evidence from 27 countries. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 836–858. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218760213
  34. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
  35. Powell, J. J. W. (2011). Barriers to inclusion: Special education in the United States and Germany. Paradigm Publishers.
  36. Prainsack, B., & Buyx, A. (2012). Solidarity in contemporary bioethics—Towards a new approach. Bioethics, 26(7), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01987.x
  37. Prosser, J. (1999). The evolution of school culture research. In J. Prosser (Ed.), School culture (pp. 1-14). Paul Chapman Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219362.n1
  38. Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  39. Seitzer, H. (2022). Finding the poster child: Reference patterns in OECD country reports. In K. Martens & M. Windzio (Eds.), Global pathways to education: Cultural spheres, networks, and international organizations (pp. 163–189). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78885-8_6
  40. Statistics Finland. (2019). Special education 2018 (Official Statistics of Finland). https://stat.fi/til/erop/2018/erop_2018_2019-06-19_en.pdf
  41. Sundqvist, C., & Hannås, B. M. (2021). Same vision – different approaches? Special needs education in light of inclusion in Finland and Norway. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(5), 686–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1786911
  42. Takala, M., & Kokko, M. (2024). Erityisopetus oppilaiden kertomana: Näkökulmana yhteenkuuluvuuden politiikka [Special education as told by pupils: The politics of belonging as a perspective]. Kasvatus, 55(5), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.33348/kvt.154617
  43. Takala, M., Silfver, E., Karlsson, Y., & Saarinen, M. (2020). Supporting pupils in Finnish and Swedish schools: Teachers' views. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1541820
  44. Tiernan, B. (2022). Inclusion versus full inclusion: Implications for progressing inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 37(5), 882–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1961197
  45. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. UNESCO.
  46. Üstün, U., & Eryılmaz, A. (2018). Analysis of Finnish education system to question the reasons behind Finnish success in PISA. Studies in Educational Research and Development, 2(2), 93–114.
  47. Vislie, L. (2003). From integration to inclusion: Focusing global trends and changes in the western European societies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0885625082000042294
  48. Warnock, M. (2010). Special educational needs: A new look. In L. Terzi (Ed.), Special educational needs: A new look (pp. 11–45). Continuum.
  49. YÖK. (2018). Özel eğitim öğretmenliği lisans programı [Special education teaching undergraduate programme]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu. https://egitim.yok.gov.tr/tr/document/2446

Articles published in Journal of Inclusive Language Education are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) .

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
inclusive education special education special education teacher Finland comparative education

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.